Journal
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 820, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153223
Keywords
Environmental DNA; Metabarcoding; Biomonitoring; Subterranean ecology; Groundwater; Cave; Stygofauna; Troglofauna
Categories
Funding
- Australian Research Council [LP140100555, LP190100555]
- Curtin University
- University of Adelaide
- Flinders University
- BHP Bil-liton Iron Ore Pty Ltd.
- Rio Tinto Ltd.
- Chevron Australia Pty Ltd. as operator of Barrow Island
- Western Australian Museum
- South Australian Museum
- Department for Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions
- Western Australian Biodiversity Science Institute
- Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (WA)
- Bennelongia Pty Ltd.
- Biota Environ-mental Services Pty Ltd.
- BHP Social Investment Fund
- eDNA for Global Biodiversity (eDGES) programme
- Australian Research Council Industrial Transformation Training Centre for Mine Site Restora-tion [ICI150100041]
- Australian Research Council [LP190100555, LP140100555] Funding Source: Australian Research Council
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Monitoring of biota is crucial for ecosystem assessment and conservation. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding provides a reliable molecular approach for biodiversity assessments. However, eDNA-based studies targeting subterranean ecosystems are still uncommon due to their inaccessibility and cryptic nature. Recent advances in genetic and genomic analyses offer a promising framework for exploring subterranean biodiversity and ecology.
Monitoring of biota is pivotal for the assessment and conservation of ecosystems. Environments worldwide are being continuously and increasingly exposed to multiple adverse impacts, and the accuracy and reliability of the biomonitor -ing tools that can be employed shape not only the present, but more importantly, the future of entire habitats. The anal-ysis of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding data provides a quick, affordable, and reliable molecular approach for biodiversity assessments. However, while extensively employed in aquatic and terrestrial surface environments, eDNA-based studies targeting subterranean ecosystems are still uncommon due to the lack of accessibility and the cryptic nature of these environments and their species. Recent advances in genetic and genomic analyses have estab-lished a promising framework for shedding new light on subterranean biodiversity and ecology. To address current knowledge and the future use of eDNA methods in groundwaters and caves, this review explores conceptual and tech-nical aspects of the application and its potential in subterranean systems. We briefly introduce subterranean biota and describe the most used traditional sampling techniques. Next, eDNA characteristics, application, and limitations in the subsurface environment are outlined. Last, we provide suggestions on how to overcome caveats and delineate some of the research avenues that will likely shape this field in the near future. We advocate that eDNA analyses, when care-fully conducted and ideally combined with conventional sampling techniques, will substantially increase understand-ing and enable crucial expansion of subterranean community characterisation. Given the importance of groundwater and cave ecosystems for nature and humans, eDNA can bring to the surface essential insights, such as study of ecosystem assemblages and rare species detection, which are critical for the preservation of life below, as well as above, the ground.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available