4.7 Article

Spatial variations of PM2.5 emissions and social welfare induced by clean heating transition: A gridded cost-benefit analysis

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 826, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154065

Keywords

Clean heating; Ambient air pollution; Indoor air pollution; Health benefits; Social welfare

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clean heating is seen as a key strategy to tackle air pollution in northern China. To address the differences in heating habits and residents' income between urban and rural areas, a cost-benefit analysis model is used to propose an improved solution that integrates multiple heat sources. By utilizing low-cost and low-emission-intensity ISM resources, the improved solution reduces PM2.5 emissions from heating to one-fifth, and achieves higher net social benefits.
Clean heating (CH) is regard as a key strategy to address the serious air pollution problem in northern China. A one-fit-all CH strategy will harm social welfare and engender resistance, due to the differences in heating habits and residents' income between urban and rural areas. To solve this problem, a 5 km x 5 km gridded cost-benefit analysis model for CH is build. Taking the case city as an example, an improved CH solution integrating multiple heat sources is proposed. By utilizing ISM resources, which are low-cost and low-emission-intensity, the improved solution reduces heating-induced PM2.5 emissions to one-fifth, and achieves higher net social benefits than existing CH strategies. Moreover, the spatial distributions of PM ic , emission reductions and indoor and outdoor health benefits induced by CI I strategy, including coal-to-gas/electricity and the improved strategy we propose, are simulated; revealing that the spillover effects of pollutants make CH will somewhat inevitably bring about a transfer of social welfare from rural areas to urban areas, but this can be compensated by opposite direction subsidies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available