4.6 Article

Preparation and assessment of a self-healing material based on microcapsules filled with ethyl phenylacetate

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
Volume 133, Issue 20, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/APP.43430

Keywords

biomaterials; biomimetic; stimuli-sensitive polymers; swelling; thermosets

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [50775222]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A self-healing material was developed on the basis of a biological system. The self-healing epoxy resin, which incorporated microcapsules filled with ethyl phenylacetate (EPA), was investigated. The microcapsules were prepared by an in situ polymerization method. The microcapsule-formation process was monitored by optical microscopy, and the surface morphology was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The self-healing performance of the epoxy resin was assessed by manual and in situ healing experiments. We investigated the effects of the healing time, amount of EPA, and degree of curing of matrix on the healing performance by manually injecting EPA into the crack plane. The maximum healing efficiency was obtained within 24 h. The swelling curve was overlaid onto the healed load plot; this indicated that crack healing was achieved as a result of solvent diffusion. The healing load reached the maximum value when the amount of EPA was 0.5 mu L and was capable of filling the crack volume. Moreover, the healing performance was related to the degree of swelling. The in situ healing efficiency was dependent on the microcapsule concentration. The fracture toughness could be fully restored when the microcapsule concentration was 10%. Finally, the crack interface was analyzed with SEM. The results show that the fracture line was difficult to detect, and this suggested complete crack healing by EPA. (C) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133, 43430.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available