4.6 Article

Improving the flame-retardant efficiency of aluminum hydroxide with fullerene for high-density polyethylene

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
Volume 134, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/app.44551

Keywords

composites; flame retardance; mechanical properties; thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51673173]
  2. Ningbo Science and Technology Innovation Team [2015B11005]
  3. Ningbo City Natural Science Foundation [2014A610117]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of fullerene (C-60) on the flame retardancy and thermal stability of high-density polyethylene (HDPE)/aluminum hydroxide (ATH) composites was studied. After the addition of three portions of C-60 to an HDPE-ATH (mass ratio=100:120) composite, a V-0 rating in the UL-94 vertical combustion test was achieved, and the limiting oxygen index increased by about 2%. The results of cone testing also showed that the addition of C-60 effectively extended the time to ignition and the time to maximum heat-release rate while cutting down the peak heat-release rate. Thus, fewer flame retardants were needed to achieve a satisfactory flame retardance. Consequently, the adverse effects on the mechanical properties because of the high level of flame-retardant loading was reduced, as evidenced by the obvious enhancements in the tensile strength, elongation at break, and flexural strength. Electron spin resonance spectroscopy proved that C-60 was an efficient free-radical scavenger toward HO center dot radicals. Thermogravimetric analysis coupled to Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy demonstrated that in both N-2 and air atmospheres, C-60 increased the onset temperature of the matrix by about 10 degrees C because of its enormous capacity to absorb free radicals evolved from the degradation of the matrix to form crosslinked network, which was covered by aluminum oxide. (C) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available