4.0 Review

Gene-Immune Therapy of Cancer: Approaches and Problems

Journal

RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS
Volume 58, Issue 5, Pages 491-506

Publisher

PLEIADES PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.1134/S1022795422040020

Keywords

immunotherapy; gene therapy; cancer; immune checkpoints; cytokines; danger signals; GDEPT

Funding

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [20-115-50440]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tumor heterogeneity and therapy resistance require combinatorial approaches. Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment. Local therapy and intratumoral introduction of therapeutic genes can reduce side effects and achieve targeted treatment.
Tumor heterogeneity and constant selection of therapy-resistant cancer cells in the tumor require combinatorial approaches to the treatment of cancer that affect various vital processes in the tumor. Immunotherapy made a revolution among approaches to cancer treatment. Today, many combinatorial methods are grouped around this type of treatment. Most antitumor immunotherapeutic agents are administered intravenously, which cause serious, often life-threatening, side effects due to the accumulation of these agents in nontarget tissues. Side effects can be reduced using local therapy, which is limited to the tumor, but at the same time causes systemic antitumor immune response. Localization of the action can be achieved by intratumoral introduction of therapeutic genes. These genes can encode a variety of therapeutic products, ranging from checkpoint inhibitors and immunomodulators to enzymes that mediate intratumoral conversion of prodrugs into chemotherapeutic agents (gene-directed enzyme prodrug therapy, GDEPT). In this review, we will consider approaches that use intratumoral introduction of therapeutic genes encoding molecules of immune checkpoints, cytokines, danger signals, and GDEPT enzymes, as well as their combination for gene-immune therapy of cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available