4.4 Article

Original Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) do not Increase the Risk of Hepatic Impairment in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: Insights from Multi-Source Medical Data

Journal

REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

IMR PRESS
DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2303098

Keywords

dabigatran; rivaroxaban; apixaban; edoxaban; vitamin K antagonists; liver injury; drug adverse event; pharmacovigilance; real-world data

Funding

  1. Clinical Research In-novation and Cultivation Fund of Ren Ji hospital [RJPY-LX-008]
  2. Development Fund for Shanghai Talents [2020110]
  3. Research Project of Drug Clinical Comprehen-sive Evaluation and Drug Treatment Pathway [SHYXH-ZP-2021-001]
  4. Ren Ji Boost Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China [RJTJ-JX-001]
  5. Shanghai Rising Stars of Medical Talent Youth Development Pro-gram - Youth Medical Talents - Clinical Pharmacist Pro-gram [SHWJRS (2019) _072]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Insights from multi-source medical data confirm that the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is not associated with an increased risk of hepatic impairment in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).
Background: There is controversy over whether non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) use increase the risk of hepatic impairment in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). We conducted a comprehensive assessment using multi-source medical data. Methods: We first performed a systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases (through 11 August 2021) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world studies (RWSs) that reported hepatic impairment events in patients with NVAF administered NOACs or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) therapy. The primary outcomes were hepatic impairment identified by diagnostic liver injury (DLI) or abnormal liver enzyme (ALE). The secondary outcome was hepatic failure. Relative risks (RRs) for RCTs and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for RWSs were calculated separately using random-effects models. We also conducted a disproportionality analysis by extracting reports of hepatic impairment associated with NOACs from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) were calculated to identify the statistical associations between NOACs and hepatic impairment. Scenario analyses were further performed to eliminate event-and drug-related competition bias. Results: A total of 559,873 patients from five RCTs and four RWSs were included in the pooled analysis. For RCTs, NOACs use was not associated with an increased risk of DLI (RR: 0.96, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.73-1.28) or ALE (RR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.69-1.19) compared with VKAs. The merged results of RWSs also showed a similar risk of DLI (aHR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.72-1.09) or ALE (aHR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.82-1.00) between NOACs and VKAs. The results of hepatic failure were in accordance with the primacy outcomes. Analyses of individual NOACs did not significantly affect the results. Insights from the FAERS database failed to detect hepatic impairment signals for overall NOACs agents (ROR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.32-0.37). Scenario analyses confirmed the primary results. Conclusions: Insights from multi-source medical data confirmed that NOACs use was not associated with an increased risk of hepatic impairment in patients with NVAF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available