4.5 Article

Force and torque-free helical tail robot to study low Reynolds number micro-organism swimming

Journal

REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS
Volume 93, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0079815

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This letter describes the development of an autonomous swimming robot with a helical tail that operates in a viscous-dominated environment. The flow fields were studied to understand wall effects and hydrodynamic interactions among swimmers. The experimental results were compared with analytical predictions, showing that this robot mimics bacterial swimming strategy and has potential for future applications.
Helical propulsion is used by many micro-organisms to swim in viscous-dominated environments. Their swimming dynamics are relatively well understood, but a detailed study of the flow fields is still needed to understand wall effects and hydrodynamic interactions among swimmers. In this letter, we describe the development of an autonomous swimming robot with a helical tail that operates in the Stokes regime. The device uses a battery-based power system with a miniature motor that imposes a rotational speed on a helical tail. The speed, direction, and activation are controlled electronically using an infrared remote control. Since the robot is about 5 cm long, we use highly viscous fluids to match the Reynolds number, Re, to be less than 0.1. Measurements of swimming speeds are conducted for a range of helical wavelengths, lambda, head geometries, and rotation rates, omega. We provide comparisons of the experimental measurements with analytical predictions derived from resistive force theory. This force and torque-free neutrally buoyant swimmer mimics the swimming strategy of bacteria more closely than previously used designs and offers a lot of potential for future applications. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available