4.4 Article

INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP TECHNIQUE WITHOUT POSTOPERATIVE FACE-DOWN POSITIONING FOR MACULAR HOLE REPAIR

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003350

Keywords

macular hole; flap; positioning; face-down

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for macular hole closure without postoperative face-down positioning has shown a high success rate in this study. Most patients achieved anatomical and functional success, with significant improvements in visual acuity. Larger prospective studies are needed to further explore this technique.
Purpose: To describe the outcomes of the inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique without postoperative face-down positioning for macular hole (MH) closure. Methods: This retrospective longitudinal study identified patients who had undergone surgical repair for large (>400 mu m), idiopathic MHs and did not maintain face-down positioning postoperatively. Outcome measures included anatomical success, defined as confirmation of hole closure by the optical coherence tomography scan and functional success and defined as improved best-corrected visual acuity from baseline at the last follow-up. Results: Of the 63 eyes enrolled in the study, 94% patients (59 of 63) achieved anatomical success and 91% patients (57 of 63) achieved functional success. Fifteen (15) of these patients presented with a MH >600 mu m. This subgroup achieved an anatomical success rate of 93% and a functional success rate of 87%. Statistically significant improvement in best-corrected visual acuity was demonstrated for all subgroups of MH size (P < 0.001). Conclusion: We report a high success rate of large, idiopathic MH closure with the inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique without postoperative face-down positioning. The results described in this study are favorable. However, larger studies with prospective design are warranted to explore this further.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available