4.4 Article

A comment on the protect-manage-then-restore workflow

Journal

RESTORATION ECOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/rec.13666

Keywords

climate change; decisions; hierarchy; mitigation; restoration; returns; risk; strategy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Decisions and judgment are complex processes due to the profound pressures exerted by global change on natural systems. A hierarchical approach is proposed to prioritize interventions based on implementation timing, with protecting first, managing second, and restoring last. This optimization workflow is considered reasonable for addressing various global challenges, not limited to climate mitigation through restoration.
Decisions and judgment are complex processes. There is a dire need to redress, offset, and salvage function in most natural systems with the profound pressures exerted by global change. We must judge threats and decide between solutions. A recent perspective from a climate mediation perspective proposed a hierarchical approach to consider with respect to the implementation timing for interventions by restoration ecologists. The three steps in descending order of estimated returns included protect first, manage, then restore. This opinion discusses the value of the optimization, and concludes that the workflow is reasonable for many other global grand challenges in addition to restorations that potentially mitigate climate effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available