4.4 Article

Microwave Ablation for Malignant Central Airway Obstruction: A Pilot Study

Journal

RESPIRATION
Volume 101, Issue 7, Pages 666-674

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000522544

Keywords

Airway obstruction; Bronchoscopic treatment; Interventional bronchoscopy; Lung cancer; Microwave ablation; Tracheobronchial obstruction; Tumor ablation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presented a pilot study using endobronchial microwave ablation (MWA) via flexible bronchoscopy for the management of malignant central airway obstruction (CAO). The results showed successful airway recanalization in all cases without complications. Endobronchial MWA is a novel technique for tumor destruction while maintaining a patent airway.
Background: Malignant central airway obstruction (CAO) is a debilitating complication of primary lung cancer and pulmonary metastases. Therapeutic bronchoscopy is used to palliate symptoms and/or bridge to further therapy. Microwave ablation (MWA) heats tissue by creating an electromagnetic field around an ablation device. We present a pilot study utilizing endobronchial MWA via flexible bronchoscopy as a novel modality for the management of malignant CAO. Methods: Therapeutic bronchoscopy with a flexible MWA probe was performed in 8 cases. We reviewed tumor size, previous ablative techniques, number of applications, ablation time, amount of energy delivered, rate of successful recanalization, complications, and 30-day follow-up. Results: Successful airway recanalization was achieved in all cases. No complications were noted. In 1 case, tumor in-growth within a silicone stent was ablated with no damage to the stent. Discussion: Endobronchial MWA is a novel technique for tumor destruction while maintaining an airway axis. The oven effect and air gap around a tumor allow for safe and effective tissue devitalization and hemostasis without a thermal effect on structures surrounding the airway.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available