4.7 Article

Global copper cycles and greenhouse gas emissions in a 1.5 °C world

Journal

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING
Volume 179, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106118

Keywords

Material flow analysis; Climate change; Material stock; Renewable energy; Electric vehicle

Funding

  1. Japanese Ministry ofEducation, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [21K12344, 20K20014]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21K12344, 20K20014] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Moving towards a 1.5 degrees C world could significantly impact the global copper cycle through decarbonization technologies and emissions budget. The study shows a substantial increase in copper demand, primarily driven by renewable energy-based power plants and electric vehicles. However, the emissions from the copper cycle may exceed the emissions budget, highlighting the need for collective action and mitigation efforts.
Moving towards a 1.5 degrees C world could fundamentally alter the future copper cycle through two key drivers: the implementation of decarbonization technologies and the imposition of an emissions budget on production ac-tivities. This study explores the impact of these drivers on the global copper cycle using a dynamic material flow analysis, coupled with an optimization technique. The results show that global final demand for copper could increase by a factor of 2.5 between 2015 and 2050, reaching 62 million metric tons, with approximately 4% of the increase coming from copper used in renewable energy-based power plants and 14% coming from electric vehicles. While there are sufficient resources to meet this growing demand, the greenhouse gas emissions of the copper cycle could account for approximately 2.7% of the total emissions budget by 2050, up from 0.3% today. Assessment of possible mitigation efforts by the copper industry shows that this can be halved, but will still be 35% short of the emissions budget target based on proportional responsibility, i.e., applying the same mitigation rate to all sectors. Rather, collective action is required by all stakeholders interacting with the copper cycle to bridge the mitigation gap, including through efforts to drive advanced sorting, higher fabrication yields, extended product lifetimes, and increased service efficiency of in-use copper stock.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available