4.8 Article

Sustainable technology acceptability: Mapping technological, contextual, and social-psychological determinants of EU stakeholders' biofuel acceptance

Journal

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
Volume 158, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112114

Keywords

Sustainable technology acceptance; Biofuel adoption; EU stakeholders; Qualitative analysis; Interviews

Funding

  1. European Commission [764089]
  2. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [764089] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This qualitative study identifies barriers and facilitators regarding the acceptability of biofuel technology and discusses specific issues in each aspect. It is of great importance for the EU sustainable energy transition.
The acceptance of biofuels is of paramount importance for the EU sustainable energy transition. This qualitative study identifies barriers and facilitators regarding biofuel technology acceptability. Stakeholders initially selected for their interest and influence in the EU biofuel field were asked about biofuel acceptance and four clusters of variables associated with the acceptability according to the literature on similar sustainable technologies: technology per se, economic and market-related aspects, political and administrative aspects, and social-psychological features of the person. Results from a qualitative content analysis based on 32 stakeholders interviews confirmed the presence of contents in these four clusters, highlighting specific issues linked to biofuel technology acceptability. Facilitating and inhibiting aspects of each cluster are discussed; quantitative research developments as well as applied implications are envisioned towards biofuel acceptance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available