4.5 Article

Catheter-guided multilevel epidural blood patches in an adolescent boy

Journal

REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE
Volume 47, Issue 7, Pages 430-433

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2022-103487

Keywords

Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures; Pain Management; Treatment Outcome; Acute Pain; Pediatrics

Categories

Funding

  1. Montreal Children's Hospital Foundation
  2. Louis and Alan Edwards Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This case report describes a young patient with multilevel cerebrospinal fluid leaks and status migrainosus. After multiple catheter-guided blood patch procedures, the patient's symptoms resolved without further complications.
Background There is increasing evidence for the use of multilevel epidural catheter-guided blood patches to treat spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leaks in adults. Yet, there are scarce data for their use in children. Furthermore, higher level epidural blood patches are uncommon in both adult and pediatric populations. Case presentation An adolescent boy with multilevel cerebrospinal fluid leaks associated with status migrainosus failed conservative pain management treatment. As he remained severely symptomatic, epidural blood patches were required to mitigate his symptoms. Given his multilevel leaks, a catheter-guided blood patch approach was used to treat multiple cervicothoracic and thoracolumbar leaks. After three separate uneventful blood patch procedures, the patient was free of symptoms. Other than some rebound intracranial hypertension, the patient maintained full neurological capacity without further complications. Following the resolution of treatment, he has not sought help for pain since his last blood patch over a year ago. Conclusions Multilevel catheter-guided blood patches have the potential to be administered to higher level spinal regions to the pediatric population suffering from multiple spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leaks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available