4.6 Article

Tuning the charge carrier density in the thermoelectric colusite

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 119, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4948475

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [26820296, 25420699]
  2. Thermal and Electric Energy Technology Foundation
  3. Electric Technology Research Foundation of Chugoku
  4. International Joint Research Program for Innovative Energy Technology - METI, Japan
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25420699, 26820296] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The colusite Cu26V2Sn6S32 has high potential as a thermoelectric material at medium-high temperatures because of a large Seebeck coefficient (S similar or equal to 220 mu V/K) and rather small electrical resistivity (rho similar or equal to 100 mu Omega m) at 660 K. To improve the thermoelectric performance, we have tuned the hole carrier density p by substituting Zn for Cu in Cu26-xZnxV2Sn6S32 (x = 1-3) and starting with Cu and Sn deficient compositions in Cu26-yV2Sn6S32 (y = 1, 2) and Cu26V2Sn6-zS32 (z = 0.25-1), respectively. Powder x-ray diffraction and electron-probe microanalysis showed that the Zn-substituted samples and Sn-deficient (z >= 0.5) samples are formed in a single phase, whereas the Cu26-yV2Sn6S32 samples are composed of two phases with slightly different compositions. Within these samples, the value of p at 300K varies in the range between 3.6 x 10(20) and 2.8 x 10(21) cm(-3). The relation between p and S led to the effective mass m* of 4-7m(0) for the hole carriers. The large S of the colusite is therefore ascribed to the heavy mass carriers of the valence band top. The decreases in p with x and y reduced the dimensionless thermoelectric figure of merit ZT, whereas the increase in p with z raised ZT from 0.56 (z = 0) to 0.62 (z = 0.5) at 660 K. Published by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available