4.7 Article

Survival benefits for non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with adaptive radiotherapy

Journal

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
Volume 168, Issue -, Pages 234-240

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.01.039

Keywords

NSCLC; Adaptive radiotherapy; Pneumonitis; Survival; Image guided radiotherapy

Funding

  1. DCCC Radiotherapy - The Danish National Research Center for Radiotherapy, Danish Cancer Society [R191-A11526]
  2. Danish Comprehensive Cancer Center
  3. Danish Cancer Society [R90-A6244, R209-A13036]
  4. Cancer research UK [C19942/A28832]
  5. Yorkshire Cancer Research [L389AA]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the clinical benefits of tumor match and adaptive radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer patients. The results showed that tumor match and adaptive radiotherapy significantly reduced the incidence of radiation pneumonitis and improved progression-free and overall survival.
Introduction: Tumor match and adaptive radiotherapy based on on-treatment imaging increases the precision of RT. This allows a reduction of treatment volume and, consequently, of the dose to organs at risk. We investigate the clinical benefits of tumor match and adaptive radiotherapy for a cohort of non-small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC). Methods: In 2013, tumor match and adaptive radiotherapy based on daily cone-beam CT scans was introduced to ensure adaption of the radiotherapy treatment plan for all patients with significant anatomical changes during radiotherapy. Before 2013, the daily cone-beam CT scans were matched on the vertebra and anatomical changes were not evaluated systematically. To estimate the effect of tumor match and adaptive radiotherapy, 439 consecutive NSCLC patients treated with definitive chemo-radiotherapy (50-66 Gy/25-33 fractions, 2010-2018) were investigated retrospectively. They were split in two groups, pre-ART (before tumor match and adaptive radiotherapy, 184 patients), and ART (after tumor match and adaptive radiotherapy, 255 patients) and compared with respect to clinical, treatment-specific and dosi-metric variables (chi(2) tests, Mann Whitney U tests), progression, survival and radiation pneumonits (CTCAEv3). Progression-free and overall survival as well as radiation pneumonitis were compared with log-rank tests. Hazard ratios were estimated from Cox proportional hazard regression. Results: No significant differences in stage (p = 0.36), histology (p = 0.35), PS (p = 0.12) and GTV volumes (p = 0.24) were observed. Concomitant chemotherapy was administered more frequently in the ART group (78%) compared to preART (64%), p < 0.001. Median[range] PTV volumes decreased from 456 [71;1262] cm(3) (preART) to 270 [31;1166] cm(3) (ART), p < 0.001, thereby significantly reducing mean doses to lungs (median, preART 16.4 [1.9;24.7] Gy, ART 12.1 [1.7;19.4] Gy, p < 0.001) and heart (median, preART 8.0 [0.1;32.1] Gy, ART 4.4 [0.1;33.9] Gy, p < 0.001). The incidence of RP at nine months decreased significantly with ART (50% to 20% for symptomatic RP (>= G2), 21% to 7% for severe RP (>= G3), 6% to 0.4% for lethal RP (G5), all p < 0.001). The two-year progression free survival increased from 22% (preART) to 30% (ART), while the overall survival increased from 43% (preART) to 56% (ART). The median overall survival time increased from 20 (preART) to 28 months (ART). Conclusion: Tumor match and adaptive radiotherapy significantly decreased radiation pneumonitis, while maintaining loco-regional control. Further, we observed a significantly improved progressionfree and overall survival. (C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available