4.7 Article

Glacial isostatic adjustment in the Red Sea: Impact of 3-D Earth structure

Journal

QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS
Volume 280, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107415

Keywords

Sea level changes; Last glacial maximum; Numeric modeling; Mantle viscosity; Holocene

Funding

  1. Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences at Harvard University
  2. Harvard University Center for the Environment
  3. Australian government's Exploring for the Future program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sea-level history in the Red Sea region is influenced by both global mean sea level and glacial isostatic adjustment. Three-dimensional Earth models show that the presence of the Red Sea Rift and low-viscosity upper mantle amplify sea-level rise, resulting in different effects at different locations. Coastal sites experience sea-level fall, while sites near the rift experience sea-level rise.
Sea-level history in the Red Sea region has commonly been interpreted as an accurate proxy for global mean sea level (GMSL), which can be used to constrain global ice volumes and inform a diverse range of regional paleoclimate studies. Previous modeling work has demonstrated, however, that glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) processes may introduce significant departures from GMSL in this region. The GIA signal is a complex combination of deformational, gravitational, and rotational effects arising from shifting ice and water surface loads and consists of long-wavelength effects superimposed by a short-wavelength signal associated with continental levering - a response to local meltwater loading. In this study, we revisit the effects of GIA in the Red Sea region using Earth models characterized by 3-D variations in mantle viscoelastic structure and lithospheric thickness, focusing on the period from Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) to present day. We find that the presence of the Red Sea Rift and low-viscosity upper mantle acts to amplify sea-level rise associated with continental levering, yielding a more pronounced rise for sites toward the center of the Red Sea during deglaciation in comparison to GMSL. In contrast, coastal sites experience a net GIA-induced sea-level fall that acts in opposition to the GMSL rise. Furthermore, while the maximum departure from GMSL occurs close to LGM for northern sites, the GIA signal can peak as late as 14 Ica for southern sites. Simulations based on 3-D Earth models tend to show a smaller departure from GMSL than 1-D predictions for most coastal sites, including at the Strait of Bab elMandeb at the mouth of the Red Sea, and typically peak at similar to 10 m. The opposite is true for sites close to the rift: at these locations the difference between the 1-D and 3-D simulations can reach similar to 20 m. We therefore conclude that any mapping from local sea level to GMSL is both location and time dependent and cannot be captured by a simple linear scaling. (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available