4.5 Article

Identifying health-related quality of life cut-off scores that indicate the need for supportive care in young adults with cancer

Journal

QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
Volume 31, Issue 9, Pages 2717-2727

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03139-6

Keywords

Quality of life; Patient-reported outcomes; Routine care; Supportive care needs; Oncology; Young adult

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Research Network
  2. Dutch Cancer Society [KUN2015-7527]
  3. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
  4. Institute of Cancer Research, London

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to determine the cut-off scores for the use of EORTC QLQ-C30 in identifying the need for support in young adult cancer patients. The results showed that, except for the Financial Difficulties scale, the other scales had adequate sensitivity. These cut-off scores will help interpret and use EORTC QLQ-C30 in routine care.
Purpose Using patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer care may improve health outcomes. However, a lack of information about which scores are problematic in specific populations can impede use. To facilitate interpretation of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), we identified cut-off scores that indicate need for support by comparing each scale to relevant items from the Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS-LF59) in a young adult (YA) population. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey amongst YAs with cancer ages 25-39 at diagnosis. Participants completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and SCNS-LF59. Patient, clinician and research experts matched supportive care needs from the SCNS-LF59 to quality of life domains of the EORTC QLQ-C30. We evaluated the EORTC QLQ-C30 domain score's ability to detect patients with need using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis, calculating the area under the ROC curve and sensitivity and specificity for selected cut-offs. Cut-offs were chosen by maximising Youden's J statistic and ensuring sensitivity passed 0.70. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the variability of the cut-off scores by treatment status. Results Three hundred and forty-seven YAs took part in the survey. Six experts matched SCNS-LF59 items to ten EORTC QLQ-C30 domains. The AUC ranged from 0.78 to 0.87. Cut-offs selected ranged from 8 (Nausea and Vomiting and Pain) to 97 (Physical Functioning). All had adequate sensitivity (above 0.70) except the Financial Difficulties scale (0.64). Specificity ranged from 0.61 to 0.88. Four of the cut-off scores differed by treatment status. Conclusion Cut-offs with adequate sensitivity were calculated for nine EORTC QLQ-C30 scales for use with YAs with cancer. Cut-offs are key to interpretability and use of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in routine care to identify patients with supportive care need.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available