4.4 Article

Preventive replacement policy of a system considering multiple maintenance actions upon a failure

Journal

QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL
Volume 39, Issue 8, Pages 3252-3265

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/qre.3108

Keywords

age-based replacement policy; corrective replacement; imperfect repair; minimal repair; semi-Markov decision process

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Age-based preventive replacement policy focuses on finding the optimal combination of minimal repair, corrective replacement, and imperfect repair to minimize long-term average maintenance cost.
Age-based preventive replacement policy has been extensively studied in the literature. Upon an unexpected failure, most studies assume that only one type of maintenance actions can be executed to restore the system back to work. For example, minimal repair or corrective replacement that bring the system to respective as-bad-as-old and as-good-as-new states. Few studies consider both two types of maintenance actions, while predetermine the structure of the maintenance policy. Modern systems are becoming increasingly complex. Besides minimal repair and corrective replacement, imperfect repair can also be carried out to restore a failed system back to work, which brings it to a state between as-bad-as-old and as-good-as-new. This study investigates an optimal age-based replacement policy, where minimal repair, corrective replacement, and imperfect repair can be carried out upon an unexpected failure with different maintenance effects. We formulate the problem as a semi-Markov decision process (SMDP), and prove the existence of the stationary optimal policy. The optimal preventive replacement age threshold and the corresponding optimal maintenance action upon each failure are jointly obtained to minimize the long-term average maintenance cost per time unit. A numerical study is provided to illustrate the effectiveness of our proposed model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available