4.7 Article

Family history of psychosis in youth at clinical high risk: A replication study

Journal

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
Volume 311, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114480

Keywords

Clinical high risk for psychosis; Family risk; Psychosis; Transition

Categories

Funding

  1. NIMH [U01MH081984, U01MH081928, U01MH081944, U01MH081902, U01MH082004, U01MH081988, U01MH082022, U01MH076989, UO1MH081857]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Having a first-degree relative with a psychotic disorder significantly increases the severity of symptoms, lowers IQ scores, and increases the likelihood of experiencing trauma and abuse in individuals at risk for psychosis.
Having a first-degree relative with a psychotic disorder increases an individual's risk for developing psychosis to 10% compared to 1% in the general population. The impact of being at family high-risk for psychosis (FHR) has been examined in samples of youth who are at clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR). The second North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study (NAPLS-2) identified very few clinical differences between CHR individuals with and without FHR. This paper aims to confirm these results in a new CHR sample, NAPLS-3. The NAPLS-3 sample consisted of 703 CHR participants, of whom 82 were at FHR (CHR+FHR), and 621 were not (CHR+FHRneg). The Family Interview for Genetic Studies was used to determine the presence of a first-degree relative with a psychotic disorder. The groups were compared on social and role functioning, positive and negative symptoms, IQ, cannabis use, and trauma. At baseline, the CHR+FHR group reported a statistically significant increased severity of positive and negative symptoms, lower IQ scores, and increased reports of trauma, psychological and physical abuse. There were no differences in transition rates between the two groups. This study supports some of the already reported differences in trauma, physical and psychological abuse between CHR individuals with and without FHR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available