4.3 Article

Multi-layer sequential network analysis improves protein 3D structural classification

Journal

PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 90, Issue 9, Pages 1721-1731

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/prot.26349

Keywords

protein structural classification; protein structure networks; protein structures

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 GM120733]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a novel approach for protein structural classification by modeling protein 3D structures as multi-layer sequential PSNs to capture 3D sub-structures. The results show that this approach outperforms existing methods.
Protein structural classification (PSC) is a supervised problem of assigning proteins into pre-defined structural (e.g., CATH or SCOPe) classes based on the proteins' sequence or 3D structural features. We recently proposed PSC approaches that model protein 3D structures as protein structure networks (PSNs) and analyze PSN-based protein features, which performed better than or comparable to state-of-the-art sequence or other 3D structure-based PSC approaches. However, existing PSN-based PSC approaches model the whole 3D structure of a protein as a static (i.e., single-layer) PSN. Because folding of a protein is a dynamic process, where some parts (i.e., sub-structures) of a protein fold before others, modeling the 3D structure of a protein as a PSN that captures the sub-structures might further help improve the existing PSC performance. Here, we propose to model 3D structures of proteins as multi-layer sequential PSNs that approximate 3D sub-structures of proteins, with the hypothesis that this will improve upon the current state-of-the-art PSC approaches that are based on single-layer PSNs (and thus upon the existing state-of-the-art sequence and other 3D structural approaches). Indeed, we confirm this on 72 datasets spanning similar to 44 000 CATH and SCOPe protein domains.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available