4.3 Article

Circuit topology predicts pathogenicity of missense mutations

Journal

PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 90, Issue 9, Pages 1634-1644

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/prot.26342

Keywords

machine learning; mutation; protein topology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzes the circuit topological environments of 21 K mutations and finds that the number of contacts involving the mutated residue in specific circuit topological arrangements can determine the pathogenicity of human variants. The results also show that circuit topology provides nonredundant information on protein structures and the pathogenicity of mutations.
The contact topology of a protein determines important aspects of the folding process. The topological measure of contact order has been shown to be predictive of the rate of folding. Circuit topology is emerging as another fundamental descriptor of biomolecular structure, with predicted effects on the folding rate. We analyze the residue-based circuit topological environments of 21 K mutations labeled as pathogenic or benign. Multiple statistical lines of reasoning support the conclusion that the number of contacts in two specific circuit topological arrangements, namely inverse parallel and cross relations, with contacts involving the mutated residue have discriminatory value in determining the pathogenicity of human variants. We investigate how results vary with residue type and according to whether the gene is essential. We further explore the relationship to a number of structural features and find that circuit topology provides nonredundant information on protein structures and pathogenicity of mutations. Results may have implications for the polymer physics of protein folding and suggest that local topological information, including residue-based circuit topology and residue contact order, could be useful in improving state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms for pathogenicity prediction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available