4.8 Review

Thin film composite membranes for postcombustion carbon capture: Polymers and beyond

Journal

PROGRESS IN POLYMER SCIENCE
Volume 126, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2022.101504

Keywords

Thin film composite membrane; Polymer; Carbon capture; CO2 permeance; CO2/N2( )selectivity

Funding

  1. Melbourne School of Engineering
  2. Australian Research Council under the Future Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review provides an overview of trends in the materials science of thin film composite (TFC) membranes for CO2 capture from flue gas. It explores different materials and synthetic approaches and compares the performance and technical limitations of the latest TFC membranes. The outstanding challenges and opportunities for future research directions are also discussed.
The escalating level of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) due to the combustion of fossil fuels has been identified as a major contributor to climate change. CO2 capture using membrane-based gas separation provides a promising route to offset anthropogenic emissions. Thin film composite (TFC) membranes offer the capability to handle large gas flux demands and represent one of the most energy-efficient, industrially viable candidates for CO(2 )capture. In this review, we provide an overview of trends in materials science of TFC membranes for CO2 capture from flue gas. We explore the range of synthetic approaches and diverse materials (polymers, inorganics, and carbon materials) used in TFC assemblies, and critically examine the structural and chemical properties of prospective membrane materials that can help to meet the challenges of industrial CO2 capture. A comparison of the CO2/N-2 separation performance and current technical limitations of the latest TFC membranes is also provided. We conclude by sharing outstanding challenges and opportunities for future research directions in the field. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available