4.7 Article

A comparative study on safety and electrochemical characteristics of cylindrical lithium-ion cells with various formats

Journal

PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Volume 161, Issue -, Pages 126-135

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2022.03.027

Keywords

Lithium-ion cell; Thermal runaway; Overcharge; Cycling

Funding

  1. Key R&D Program of Yunnan Province [202003AC100001]
  2. Project of Anhui Jianzhu University [2019QDZ21]
  3. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [SJCX21_0442]
  4. Experimental Center of Engineering and Sciences at USTC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compares and analyzes the safety performance of two new-format cells (22650 and 26650) and the traditional 18650 cells in over-heating and overcharge tests, as well as evaluates their electrochemical characteristics through long-term cycling tests. The results show that the larger-sized cell exhibits gentler thermal runaway behaviors during over-heating, with longer time and higher temperature for thermal runaway. The fully charged 26650 cell demonstrates better thermal safety performance than the 18650 and 22650 cells in over-heating tests. It also exhibits superior safety performance during overcharging and promising electrochemical features with larger capacity and less degradation over long-term cycling, compared to the 18650 and 22650 cells.
The present work carries out a comparative study to illustrate the safety performance of two new-format cells (22650 and 26650) in the thermal runaway tests induced by over-heating and overcharge tests, referred by the traditional 18650 cells. In addition, a long-term cycling test is also performed to evaluate the electrochemical characteristics of the three cells. When charged to the same capacity (1700 mAh), the cell with a larger size demonstrates comparative gentler thermal runaway behaviors during the over-heating, with a longer time to thermal runway and a higher temperature to thermal runaway. The thermal runaway of the fully charged 26650 cell lags behind that of 18650 and 22650 cells in the over-heating tests; that is, the 26650 cell shows the best thermal safety performance among the three kinds of cells. The safety performance of the 26650 cell is also more competitive than 18650 and 22650 cells during overcharging, with a larger SOCend illustrated when the interior safety devices take effects. At last, the 26650 cell shows more promising electrochemical features, demonstrating a larger absolute capacity and a slighter degradation over the long-term cycling, in comparison with 18650 and 22650 cells. (c) 2022 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available