4.6 Article

Purification of high-temperature resistant polyethylene terephthalate (PET) hydrolase by simple heating protocol

Journal

PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 114, Issue -, Pages 42-51

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2022.01.011

Keywords

Cutinase; Enzyme purification; Enzyme activity; Heating

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31961133018]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2021YFC2103600]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study suggests a novel method for purifying high-purity polyethylene terephthalate (PET) hydrolase using a simple heating protocol. The purified PET hydrolases showed competitive specific activities compared to conventional nickel column purification methods, with higher protein and enzyme recovery rates.
In this study, a novel high-purity polyethylene terephthalate (PET) hydrolase purification method was suggested, which was based on a simple heating protocol. To test the applicability of the method, the heating purification performances of different types of thermo-resistant PET hydrolases, including ThcCut1, ThcCut2, TfCut2, TfCut2G62A, TfCut2-G62A/F209A, and LCC-F243I/D238C/S283C/Y127G, from crude extract were conducted. During the process, the effect of protectants and treatment duration on proteins and activity recoveries were tested. Results indicated that the specific activities of PET hydrolases purified by heating were generally as competitive as the ones purified by conventional nickel column methods, with higher protein recovery and enzyme activity recovery. The practical application of the heating purified PET hydrolases was further evaluated. Except for ThcCut2, other PET hydrolases exhibited better degradation performances of PET nanoparticles. The novel heating purification method for PET hydrolases showed good applicability, which can be extended to purify other thermo-resistant enzymes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available