The exploitation of sexual signals by predators: a meta-analysis

Sexual signals are often central to reproduction, and their expression is thought to strike a balance between advertising to mates and avoiding detection by predatory eavesdroppers. Tests of the predicted predation costs have produced mixed results, however. Here we synthesized 187 effects from 78 experimental studies in a meta-analytic test of two questions; namely, whether predators, parasites and parasitoids express preferences for the sexual signals of prey, and whether sexual signals increase realized predation risk in the wild. We found that predators and parasitoids express strong and consistent preferences for signals in forced-choice contexts. We found a similarly strong overall increase in predation on sexual signallers in the wild, though here it was modality specific. Olfactory and acoustic signals increased the incidence of eavesdropping relative to visual signals, which experienced no greater risk than controls on average. Variation in outcome measures was universally high, suggesting that contexts in which sexual signalling may incur no cost, or even reduce the incidence of predation, are common. Our results reveal unexpected complexity in a central viability cost to sexual signalling, while also speaking to applied problems in invasion biology and pest management where signal exploitation holds promise for bio-inspired solutions.

Automated summary

This study conducted a meta-analysis to test the preferences of predators, parasites, and parasitoids for the sexual signals of prey and found strong preferences in forced-choice contexts. In the wild, there was an overall increase in predation on sexual signallers, particularly for olfactory and acoustic signals. However, there was high variation in outcome measures, suggesting that sexual signalling may not always incur costs and may even reduce predation incidence in some contexts.