4.5 Article

Elastic anisotropy in the reduced Landau-de Gennes model

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2021.0966

Keywords

nematic liquid crystal; Landau-de Gennes; elastic anisotropy; asymptotic analyses; bifurcation diagrams

Funding

  1. University of Strathclyde
  2. Leverhulme International Academic Fellowship
  3. Royal Society
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the effects of elastic anisotropy on Landau-de Gennes critical points in nematic liquid crystals on a square domain. Various symmetric critical points are discovered and the stabilizing effects of L-2 are proven. Numerical bifurcation diagrams illustrate the interplay of elastic anisotropy and geometry in nematic solution landscapes.
We study the effects of elastic anisotropy on Landau-de Gennes critical points, for nematic liquid crystals, on a square domain. The elastic anisotropy is captured by a parameter, L-2, and the critical points are described by 3 d.f. We analytically construct a symmetric critical point for all admissible values of L-2, which is necessarily globally stable for small domains, i.e. when the square edge length, lambda, is small enough. We perform asymptotic analyses and numerical studies to discover at least five classes of these symmetric critical points-the WORS, Ring & PLUSMN;, Constant and pWORS solutions, of which the WORS, Ring+ and Constant solutions can be stable. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the novel Constant solution is energetically preferable for large lambda and large L-2, and prove associated stability results that corroborate the stabilizing effects of L-2 for reduced Landau-de Gennes critical points. We complement our analysis with numerically computed bifurcation diagrams for different values of L-2, which illustrate the interplay of elastic anisotropy and geometry for nematic solution landscapes, at low temperatures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available