4.8 Article

Highly motile cells are metabolically responsive to collagen density

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2114672119

Keywords

migration; mechanobiology; extracellular matrix; metabolism; heterogeneity

Funding

  1. NIH [HL127499, GM131178]
  2. W. M. Keck Foundation
  3. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE-1650411]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that changes in collagen density are correlated with cell migration ability and bioenergetics, with significantly different effects observed in highly motile cells. These results reveal a link between matrix mechanics, migratory phenotype, and bioenergetics.
Altered tissue mechanics and metabolism have gained significant attention as drivers of tumorigenesis, and mechanoresponsive metabolism has been implicated in migration and metastasis. However, heterogeneity in cell populations makes it difficult to link changes in behavior with metabolism, as individual cell behaviors are not necessarily reflected in population-based measurements. As such, the impact of increased collagen deposition, a tumor-associated collagen signature, on metabolism remains ambiguous. Here, we utilize a wide range of collagen densities to alter migration ability and study the bioenergetics of individual cells over time. Sorting cells based on their level of motility revealed energetics are a function of collagen density only for highly motile cells, not the entire population or cells with low motility. Changes in migration with increasing collagen density were correlated with cellular energetics, where matrix conditions most permissive to migration required less energy usage during movement and migrated more efficiently. These findings reveal a link between matrix mechanics, migratory phenotype, and bioenergetics and suggest that energetic costs are determined by the extracellular matrix and influence cell motility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available