4.8 Article

Full adoption of the most effective strategies to mitigate methane emissions by ruminants can help meet the 1.5°C target by 2030 but not 2050

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2111294119

Keywords

methane; meta-analysis; ruminant; enteric; mitigation

Funding

  1. EU [FP7-266018]
  2. Joint Programming Initiative on Food Security, Agriculture, and Climate Change
  3. Kravis Scientific Research Fund (New York)
  4. National Program for Scientific Research and Advanced Studies-PROCIENCIA [016-2019]
  5. German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (issued through Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Internationale Zusammenarbei) through the research Programme of Climate Smart Livestock [2017.0119.2]
  6. US Department of Agriculture (Washington, DC) National Institute of Food and Agriculture Federal Appropriations [PEN 04539, 1000803]
  7. Sesnon Endowed Chair Fund of the University of California, Davis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To meet the 1.5 degrees C target, strategies to reduce methane emissions from ruminants must be implemented, including decreasing CH4 per unit meat or milk and decreasing absolute CH4 emissions. The adoption of the most effective strategies could achieve the goal by 2030, but not by 2050.
To meet the 1.5 degrees C target, methane (CH4) from ruminants must be reduced by 11 to 30% by 2030 and 24 to 47% by 2050 compared to 2010 levels. A meta-analysis identified strategies to decrease product-based (PB; CH4 per unit meat or milk) and absolute (ABS) enteric CH4 emissions while maintaining or increasing animal productivity (AP; weight gain or milk yield). Next, the potential of different adoption rates of one PB or one ABS strategy to contribute to the 1.5 degrees C target was estimated. The database included findings from 430 peer-reviewed studies, which reported 98 mitigation strategies that can be classified into three categories: animal and feed management, diet formulation, and rumen manipulation. A random-effects meta-analysis weighted by inverse variance was carried out. Three PB strategies-namely, increasing feeding level, decreasing grass maturity, and decreasing dietary forage-to-concentrate ratio-decreased CH4 per unit meat or milk by on average 12% and increased AP by a median of 17%. Five ABS strategies-namely CH4 inhibitors, tanniferous forages, electron sinks, oils and fats, and oilseeds-decreased daily methane by on average 21%. Globally, only 100% adoption of the most effective PB and ABS strategies can meet the 1.5 degrees C target by 2030 but not 2050, because mitigation effects are offset by projected increases in CH 4 due to increasing milk and meat demand. Notably, by 2030 and 2050, low- and middle-income countries may not meet their contribution to the 1.5 degrees C target for this same reason, whereas high-income countries could meet their contributions due to only a minor projected increase in enteric CH4 emissions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available