4.3 Article

A sustainability approach to vehicle modular platform design: A mathematical model

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/09544089221092514

Keywords

Sustainability; new product design and development; modular design; platform; sub-pillars of sustainability; modularity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the possibility of determining the most efficient combinations of modules for each of the 23 car platforms to produce a collection of products. Through the use of the best-worst method technique and multi-objective mathematical programming, a set of platforms with maximum sustainability was achieved. The results were analyzed and the most efficient solution was selected. The module variants for the selected solution were determined and ranked using the SAW technique, and sensitivity analysis was conducted.
Today, sustainability and its economic, social, and environmental pillars are the main elements of new product market development. Therefore, manufacturers, considering all stages of a product life-cycle, consider it necessary to have a framework for producing sustainable products. Moreover, new product design and development processes especially sub-process of product definition and detailed design processes can play a very critical role in developing product sustainability. This paper considers the role that the car platform can play in creating a family of products and with regard to various data related to the environmental, economic, and social pillars of each of the 15 modules of a car platform and also, using the best-worst method technique and multi-objective mathematical programming with the augmented epsilon constraint method, we were able to achieve a set of platforms with maximum sustainability. The present study explores the possibility of determining the most efficient combinations of modules for every one of the 23 cars' platforms to produce a collection of products. Through these methods, the 54 efficient solutions in the Pareto front were achieved, and out of this number, after considering all the factors and weights of the objective functions, solution no. 51 was selected as the most efficient. Subsequently, all the 15 module variants of the 23 platforms were determined for solution no. 51. Finally, these variants were ranked on the basis of the SAW technique, and finally, sensitivity analysis is done.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available