4.4 Article

A model of strength degradation for glass fiber reinforced polymer composite laminates under fatigue loading

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/09544062221079172

Keywords

glass fiber reinforced polymer; fatigue damage; residual strength; residual stiffness

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51665029]
  2. Industrial Support Plan for Colleges and Universities in Gansu Province of China [2020C-12]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a strength degradation model based on residual stiffness degradation data to overcome the shortcomings of traditional strength modeling for GFRP composite laminates. The gradual reduction of stiffness and strength is used to describe the growth of fatigue damage, and the equivalence of damage expressed by the two degradation methods is established. The proposed model is validated using experimental data and performs better in terms of applicability and fitting accuracy compared to other models.
In order to overcome the shortcoming of traditional strength modeling of glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) composite laminates that require a large amount of strength test data, a strength degradation model on the account of residual stiffness degradation data is proposed. First, fatigue damage growth can be described by the gradual reduction of the stiffness and strength, and damage expressed by the two degradation methods are equivalent. Second, according this assumption, the connection between the two damage indices is established, and then a four parameters strength degradation model is obtained. Finally, the proposed model is validated by the applying experimental data of GFRP laminates, and the precision of proposed model is contrasted with other four models. Verification results indicate that if the residual stiffness degradation data is known, the residual strength degradation law can be predicted by a small number of residual strength tests and the presented model has better applicability and higher fitting accuracy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available