4.4 Article

Behaviour of a weakly bonded residual soil subjected to monotonic and cyclic loading

Publisher

ICE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1680/jgeen.21.00143

Keywords

full-scale tests; in situ testing; laboratory tests; repeated loading; residual soils; structure of soils

Funding

  1. FAPERGS/CNPq [12/2014 -PRONEX, 16/2551-0000469-2]
  2. MCT-CNPq
  3. MEC-CAPES (PROEX)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Residual soils, due to the structure resulting from geological formation processes, behave differently from classic soils and can undergo degradation under static and cyclic loads. This study aimed to evaluate the behavior of weakly bonded residual soil under loading and unloading cycles through field plate load tests. The results showed no shape effect of the loaded area for both monotonic and cyclic loading, and a threshold load was identified that indicated a change in soil behavior.
Residual soils are found all around the world. Their behaviour is different from 'classic' soils due to the structure resulting from the geological formation processes, which can eventually undergo degradation under static and cyclic loads, with a decrease in both stiffness and strength. In this context, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the behaviour of weakly bonded residual soil in the face of loading and unloading cycles using field plate load tests. Preliminary field and laboratory tests were carried out to characterise the residual soil at the experimental site. Monotonic and cyclic plate load tests - with circular and square plates - were performed under three different load amplitudes. The results showed no shape effect of the loaded area for both monotonic and cyclic loading, considering the same loading pattern. Also, there is a threshold load, which indicates a yielding point and a change in soil behaviour and can be estimated from simple laboratory tests. Below this load, the residual soil presented a rigid behaviour even when subjected to cyclic loads.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available