4.7 Article

Effect of gas adsorption on breakage energy of tectonic coal particles

Journal

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 406, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117575

Keywords

Gas adsorption; Surface work; Breakage energy; Fractal dimension; Coal particles

Funding

  1. State Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [52034008]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51874294]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gas adsorption can reduce coal breakage energy and prevent coal and gas outbursts. The increase in adsorption pressure and desorption duration decreases and increases the surface work, respectively. The reduction in surface work is primarily due to gas adsorbed in micropores with a size < 1.5 nm.
Coal breakage energy can be reduced using gas adsorption. The mechanism by which gas-bearing tectonic coal breaks down is critical for preventing coal and gas outbursts. For tectonic coal particles from two coal mines with a size range of 2-3 mm, a total of 67 sets of crushing experiments were performed under various gas adsorption pressure (0.5-4.0 MPa) and desorption duration (1-240 min) conditions. The fractal theory was used to analyze the particle size distributions of the fragments. The results show that as the adsorption pressure and desorption duration increase, the surface work, which is the ratio of breakage energy to the new surface area, decreases and increases, respectively. Surface work is reduced in proportions ranging from 1.45% to 37.33%. When the pore characteristics are combined with the gas adsorption volume, we confirm that the reduction in surface work (delta(gamma b)) is primarily due to gas adsorbed in micropores with a size < 1.5 nm. delta(gamma b) increases exponentially with the increase in gas adsorption volume (V-t), which can be described as delta gamma b = lambda(e(kappa Vt) -1). lambda and kappa are the material parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available