4.7 Article

Explosion characteristics and mechanism of aluminum-reduced graphene oxide composite powder

Journal

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 405, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117545

Keywords

Al -based fuels; Reduced graphene oxide; Thermal Stability; Explosion mechanism

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52006026, 51922025, 51874066]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M670759]
  3. Doctoral Research Foundation of Liaoning Province [2021BS066]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the explosion characteristics and mechanism of an aluminum-reduced graphene oxide (Al-RGO) composite. It was found that the addition of RGO reduced the activation energy of aluminum dust, increased the minimum explosible concentration and maximum explosion pressure, and improved the flame propagation speed and oxidation efficiency of aluminum.
Aluminum-based fuel in energetic formulations has favorable ignition and combustion characteristics, but it is also prone to an explosion. To ensure safe production and prevent accident, explosion characteristics and the mechanism of aluminum-reduced graphene oxide (Al-RGO) composite were investigated. Thermal analysis showed that after adding RGO, the activation energy of Al dust in the initial oxidation stage decreased from 241.5 kJ/mol to 90.0 kJ/mol. With the addition of 5 wt% RGO, PTFE, and Ni inclusions, the minimum explosible concentration increased by 40%, 10%, and 25%, the maximum explosion pressure increased by 20.8%, 13.8%, and 7.5%, respectively. Moreover, the addition of RGO could significantly improve the flame propagation speed and oxidation efficiency of aluminum but with a slight effect on the burning time of single Al particles. XPS results revealed that the major explosion product of Al-RGO is Al2O3. Based on these results, the explosion mechanism of Al-RGO was discussed in-depth.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available