4.7 Article

Characterization of sustainable natural fiber reinforced geopolymer composites

Journal

POLYMER COMPOSITES
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages 3691-3698

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pc.26646

Keywords

fracture toughness; geopolymer; natural fiber; Phoenix sp; fiber; ultrasonic pulse velocity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates that the incorporation of Phoenix sp. fibers improves the strength and fracture toughness of geopolymer composites, but reduces workability and bulk density. Additionally, a linear relationship is observed between bulk density and thermal conductivity, as well as ultrasonic pulse velocity and compressive strength. The water absorption of the composites also increases with the increase of fiber content due to the hydrophilic nature of Phoenix sp. fibers.
This article focuses on the investigation of properties of Phoenix sp. fiber based geopolymer composites. Control samples (0 wt.%) and fiber reinforced samples (1, 2, 3, and 4 wt.%) with different quantities were produced and determined their physical, mechanical, morphological, ultrasonic pulse velocity, water absorption, thermal conductivity and fracture toughness properties. The outcomes show that the incorporation of Phoenix sp. fibers to geopolymer improved the splitting tensile (1.28-2.35 MPa), compressive (27.85-32.18 MPa) and flexural strengths (3.34-6.53 MPa). By contrast, as the fiber loading increased to 4 wt.%, the workability and bulk density of geopolymer decreased to 86% and 13%, respectively. Furthermore, a linear relationship was evidenced between the bulk density and thermal conductivity, as well as ultrasonic pulse velocity and compressive strength. Due to the hydrophilic character of Phoenix sp. fibers, the water absorption increased as the fiber content increases. Due to the local mechanisms that control the bridging activity, the addition of Phoenix sp. fibers improved the fracture toughness of the composites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available