4.5 Article

Polyurethane latent catalysts obtained by emulsion solvent evaporation

Journal

POLYMER BULLETIN
Volume 80, Issue 3, Pages 3377-3393

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00289-022-04225-y

Keywords

Thermolatent catalyst; Emulsion solvent evaporation; Polyurethane; Microcapsule; Acrylic polymer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new microcapsule thermolatent catalyst was prepared using the emulsion solvent evaporation method. By changing the composition of the polymeric shell, the latency and catalytic activity of the catalyst could be controlled. Compared to traditional thermolatent catalysts, the microcapsule catalyst showed better latency and activity.
Many efforts have been made to develop catalysts for polyurethanes (PUs) due to their significant roles in the manufacturing process. However, it is still a long-standing technical issue to manipulate the catalytic activity and enhance the storage stability of PU precursors by using suitable catalyst. In this work, a new microcapsule thermolatent catalyst was prepared by emulsion solvent evaporation (ESE) method with a dibutyltin dilaurate (DBTDL) core and a polymeric shell. The glass transition temperature (T-g) of polymeric shell was utilized as threshold temperature. By changing the composition of acrylate copolymers, the glass transition temperature of polymeric shell could be controlled, which further moderated the latency and catalytic activity of ESE microcapsule catalysts. Compared to DBTDL, all ESE microcapsule catalysts showed certain latency at 30 degrees C. The catalytic activity of ESE microcapsules was rapidly increased at 70 degrees C. In the ESE microcapsule catalysts, ESE1 sample exhibited excellent performance due to the suitable T-g and uniform morphology. Compared to phenyl mercury neodecanoate and DBU, which are traditional thermolatent catalysts, ESE1 sample showed more excellent latency and catalytic activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available