4.5 Article

Self-assembly and thermal behavior of amphiphilic di-block copolymers of poly(methyl methacrylate)-block-poly(ethylene oxide) (PMMA-b-PEO)

Journal

POLYMER BULLETIN
Volume 80, Issue 2, Pages 1845-1859

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00289-022-04148-8

Keywords

Synthesis; Polymerization; Block copolymer; Micellization; Self-assembly

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, two amphiphilic di-block copolymers were synthesized and characterized, and their critical micelle concentrations (CMC) in toluene were determined. It was found that the CMC of the synthesized copolymers decreased with increasing temperature and PMMA chain length. Thermal analysis also showed that the degradation temperature of the copolymers slightly increased with increasing PMMA chain length, possibly due to the hindered diffusion of thermal energy across the entangled chains of PMMA.
Two amphiphilic di-block copolymers with composition of PMMA(118)-b-PEO45 and PMMA(25)-b-PEO45 have been synthesized and characterized by NMR and FTIR spectroscopies. The critical micelle concentration (CMC) of synthesized copolymers in toluene has been determined. The variation in CMC of both polymers was recorded under the influence of temperature. Interestingly, it was found that CMC decreases with increase in the polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) chain length and increase in temperature. A decrease in Gibbs free of micellization (Delta G(mic)) energy was found in the range of (- 17.3 to - 20.4), and increase in the entropy of micellization was observed in the range of (26.4 to 29.4) mol(-1) at temperature in the range from 293 to 323 K with 10 K increment, while enthalpy is independent of temperature. From thermal analysis, it was concluded that degradation temperature slightly increases as the PMMA length increases. This is probably due to difficult diffusion of thermal energy across the entangled chains of PMMA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available