4.6 Article

Graves' disease diagnosed in remnant thyroid after lobectomy for thyroid cancer

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265332

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea [2021IL0025]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Graves' disease can occur after lobectomy for thyroid cancer, although it is rare. It is important to properly evaluate and manage this condition during postoperative follow-up.
Background The coexistence of Graves' disease with thyroid cancer is well-known and total thyroidectomy is recommended in such cases. However, Graves' disease might be dormant at the time of surgery and diagnosed after lobectomy for thyroid cancer. Methods We assessed the incidence and clinicopathological characteristic of newly developed Graves' disease after lobectomy for thyroid cancer between 2010 and 2019. Results In all, 11043 patients underwent lobectomy for thyroid cancer during the study period, and 26 (0.2%) were diagnosed with Graves' disease during follow-up. The median age was 43.8 years, 88.5% were female, and all were euthyroid before surgery. The median time from lobectomy to the diagnosis of Graves' disease was 3.3 years. Half of the patients were diagnosed based on thyroid function tests during routine follow-up, and others were diagnosed due to symptoms of thyrotoxicosis. Among patients who had checked preoperative thyroid autoantibodies, 61.1% showed positivity. Twenty-one (80.8%), and 2 (7.7%) patients received antithyroid drugs and radioactive iodine therapy, respectively, and 3 (11.5%) underwent completion thyroidectomy. Conclusion Although rare, Graves' disease can occur in the remnant thyroid after lobectomy. Such patients are more likely to have autoantibodies. An appropriate workup is required when hyperthyroidism is found during the follow-up of patients after lobectomy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available