4.6 Article

A rapid, specific, extraction-less, and cost-effective RT-LAMP test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical specimens

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266703

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study describes an extraction-less method for the rapid qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid in upper respiratory specimens using reverse transcriptase loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP). The test exhibits high sensitivity, specificity, and does not require RNA extraction, making it suitable for use in various laboratory and remote settings.
In 2019 a newly identified coronavirus, designated as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has spread rapidly from the epicenter in Wuhan (China) to more than 150 countries around the world, causing the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In this study, we describe an extraction-less method based on reverse transcriptase loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) intended for the rapid qualitative detection of nucleic acid from SARS-CoV-2 in upper respiratory specimens, including oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swabs, anterior nasal and mid-turbinate nasal swabs, nasopharyngeal washes/aspirates or nasal aspirates as well as bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) from individuals suspected of COVID-19 by their healthcare provider. The assay's performance was evaluated and compared to an RT quantitative PCR-based assay (FDA-approved). With high sensitivity, specificity, and bypassing the need for RNA extraction, the RT-LAMP Rapid Detection assay is a valuable and fast test for an accurate and rapid RNA detection of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and potentially other pathogens. Additionally, the versatility of this test allows its application in virtually every laboratory setting and remote location where access to expensive laboratory equipment is a limiting factor for testing during pandemic crises.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available