Real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of NOACs versus VKA for stroke prevention in Spain

Aims A Markov model was adapted to assess the real-world cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban. Each of these non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants was compared with vitamin K antagonist for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Spain. Methods All inputs were derived from real-world studies: baseline patient characteristics, clinical event rates, as well as persistence rates for the vitamin K antagonist treatment option. A meta-analysis of real-world studies provided treatment effect and persistence data for rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban, each compared with vitamin K antagonist therapy. The model considered 3-month cycles over a lifetime horizon. The model outcomes included different costs, quality-adjusted life years and life-years gained. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the model. Results When compared with vitamin K antagonist, rivaroxaban incurred incremental costs of (sic)77 and resulted in incremental quality-adjusted life years of 0.08. The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year was (sic)952. For the same comparison, the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year for dabigatran was Euro4,612. Finally, compared with vitamin K antagonist, the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year for apixaban was (sic)32,015. The sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the base case results. The probabilities to be cost-effective versus vitamin K antagonist were 94%, 86% and 35%, respectively, for rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban, considering a willingness-to-pay threshold of (sic)22,000 per quality-adjusted life year gained, based on a cost-effectiveness study of the Spanish National Health System. Conclusion These results suggest that rivaroxaban and dabigatran are cost-effective versus vitamin K antagonist for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, from the Spanish National Health System perspective.

Automated summary

Based on real-world data, rivaroxaban and dabigatran are cost-effective for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation compared to vitamin K antagonist, while apixaban has a lower cost-effectiveness.