4.6 Article

Wealth, health, and beyond: Is COVID-19 less likely to spread in rich neighborhoods?

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267487

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Southwestern University of Finance and Economics under the 111 Project Research Base [B16040]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper examines the relationship between neighborhood characteristics and the spread of COVID-19 through a case study of Shenzhen. Contrary to traditional understanding, it finds that wealthier and larger neighborhoods were more likely to be infected in the first wave of the pandemic. This finding enriches the understanding of the role of neighborhoods in the spread of the pandemic and has important public policy implications.
Since December 2019, the COVID-19 pandemic has quickly spread across the world. The traditional understanding of the relationship between wealth and the spread of contagious diseases is that similar to many precedent epidemics, the pandemic spread easily in poor neighborhoods in many countries. The environmental and socioeconomic implications of the COVID-19 pandemic are still poorly understood, thus this paper examines the relationship between neighborhood characteristics and the spread of the pandemic through a case study of Shenzhen, a Chinese megacity with many low-income rural migrants. The major finding is that wealthier and larger neighborhoods in Shenzhen were more likely to be infected in the first wave of the pandemic in 2020. This spread pattern is likely to result from China's strict control to prevent the pandemic, human mobility, and demographic characteristics such as income. This finding reveals a new phenomenon that contrasts with the traditional understanding of the influence of wealth on the spread of epidemics. This paper enriches the understanding of the role of neighborhoods in the spread of the pandemic, and it has important public policy implications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available