Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of siponimod in the treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis in Italy

Background Siponimod is an effective treatment for patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS), with active disease evidenced by relapses or imaging features characteristic of multiple sclerosis inflammatory activity, however there is a need to evaluate its economic value and sustainability compared to other disease modifying-therapies (DMTs). Objective To estimate the siponimod cost-effectiveness profile and its relative budget impact compared with other DMTs, by using the Italian National Healthcare System perspective. Methods We performed: 1) a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) vs interferon beta-1b using an analytical Markov model and a life time-horizon, and 2) a budget impact analysis by using 3-years time-horizon. The results were reported as incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and net-monetary benefit (NMB) for CEA, using a willingness to pay threshold of (sic) 40,000 per QALY gained, and as difference in the overall budget (Euro) between the scenario with and without siponimod for budget impact. Results In the base case scenario siponimod resulted cost-effective compared with interferon beta1b 28,891(sic) per QALY. Overall, the market access of siponimod was associated to an increased budget of about 3(sic) millions (+0.9%) in the next 3 years simulated. Conclusion Compared to interferon beta-1b, siponimod seems to be cost-effective in SPMS patients and sustainable, with less than 1% overall budget increased in the next 3 years. Future studies need to confirm our results in the real word setting and in other countries.

Automated summary

The study found that compared to interferon beta-1b, Siponimod is cost-effective in SPMS patients and will only result in a less than 1% increase in the overall budget in the next 3 years.