4.6 Article

American Indian and Alaska Native veterans in the Indian Health Service: Health status, utilization, and cost

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266378

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Rural Health, Veterans Health Administration, US Department of Veteran Affairs [ORH-FY2018-102-1]
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [R18DK114757]
  3. National Institute on Aging [R01AG061189]
  4. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [290-2006-00020-I]
  5. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute [AD-1304-6451]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the health status, service utilization patterns, and cost of care of American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) veterans who receive care from the Indian Health Service (IHS). The findings suggest that AIAN veterans are not less healthy than AIAN non-veterans and do not require more intensive or costly care under IHS. The results indicate the viability and importance of expanding IHS-VA partnerships in community care.
PurposeMany rural American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) veterans receive care from the Indian Health Service (IHS). United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has reimbursement agreements with some IHS facilities and tribal programs and seeks to expand community partnerships in tribal areas, but details of how AIAN veterans use IHS are unknown. We aimed to assess the health status, service utilization patterns, and cost of care of veterans who use IHS. MethodsWe used comprehensive and integrated IHS data to compare health status, health service utilization and treatment cost of veterans (n = 12,242) to a matched sample of non-veterans (n = 12,242). We employed logistic, linear, or negative binomial regressions as appropriate, by sex and overall. FindingsCompared to non-veterans, veterans had lower odds of having hypertension, renal disease, all-cause dementia, and alcohol or drug use disorders, but had similar burden of other conditions. In service utilization, veterans had lower hospital inpatient days; patterns were mixed across outpatient services. Unadjusted treatment costs for veterans and non-veterans were $3,923 and $4,145, respectively; veteran adjusted treatment costs were statistically lower. Differences in significance by sex were found for health conditions and service use. ConclusionsAIAN veterans, compared to AIAN non-veterans, were not less healthy, nor did they require more intensive or more costly care under IHS. Our results indicate the viability and importance of expanding IHS-VA partnerships in community care.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available