4.7 Article

The role of petal transpiration in floral humidity generation

Journal

PLANTA
Volume 255, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00425-022-03864-9

Keywords

Angiosperm; Floral evolution; Floral traits; Pollinator cue; Robot arm

Categories

Funding

  1. Bristol Centre for Agricultural Innovation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By using petrolatum gel as an antitranspirant on the flowers, the study confirms the significant contribution of transpiration to floral humidity generation, and the contribution may vary among different species.
Main conclusion Using petrolatum gel as an antitranspirant on the flowers of California poppy and giant bindweed, we show that transpiration provides a large contribution to floral humidity generation. Floral humidity, an area of elevated humidity in the headspace of flowers, is believed to be produced predominantly through a combination of evaporation of liquid nectar and transpirational water loss from the flower. However, the role of transpiration in floral humidity generation has not been directly tested and is largely inferred by continued humidity production when nectar is removed from flowers. We test whether transpiration contributes to the floral humidity generation of two species previously identified to produce elevated floral humidity, Calystegia silvatica and Eschscholzia californica. Floral humidity production of flowers that underwent an antitranspirant treatment, petrolatum gel which blocks transpiration from treated tissues, is compared to flowers that did not receive such treatments. Gel treatments reduced floral humidity production to approximately a third of that produced by untreated flowers in C. silvatica, and half of that in E. californica. This confirms the previously untested inferences that transpiration has a large contribution to floral humidity generation and that this contribution may vary between species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available