4.7 Article

Carbon sequestration in soil and biomass under native and non-native mangrove ecosystems

Journal

PLANT AND SOIL
Volume 479, Issue 1-2, Pages 61-76

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-022-05352-1

Keywords

Blue carbon; Coastal wetland; Carbon sink; Land use; Soil organic carbon

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U21A6001, 41975113]
  2. Guangdong Provincial Department of Science and Technology [2019ZT08G090]
  3. Innovation Group Project of Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai) [SML2020SP004, 311021003, 311021004]
  4. Guangdong Forestry Science and Technology Innovation Project [2021KJCX012, 2022KJCX019]
  5. U.S. Department of Energy grant
  6. U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-NA-0003525]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the carbon sequestration capacity of two dominant mangrove species, native Kandelia obovata and exotic Sonneratia apetala, in Qi'ao Island, China. The results show that both species act as strong carbon sinks compared to mudflat reference, with overall ecosystem carbon storage being comparable. However, the non-native species, Sonneratia apetala, exhibits a significantly higher carbon sequestration rate due to fast biomass carbon sequestration. The input of autochthonous source (mangrove tissues) contributes substantially to additional carbon sequestration under mangroves.
Aims Mangrove ecosystems can help mitigate climate change by sequestering significant amounts of carbon (C) from the atmosphere and ocean, contributing to regional blue carbon stocks. However, it is unclear whether non-native species introduced in coastal wetlands can function as a more efficient carbon sink. Methods By examining two dominant mangrove species, native Kandelia obovata (KO) and exotic Sonneratia apetala Buch.-Ham. (SA), at the Qi'ao Island, China, we quantified and compared ecosystem C storage, C sequestration rate, source and stability of soil organic carbon (SOC) under different vegetation covers. Results & conclusion Our results showed that both species acted as strong carbon sinks relative to mudflat reference, with overall ecosystem C storage being comparable under KO (410 Mg C ha(-1)) and SA with different stand ages (224-452 Mg C ha(-1)), but a few times higher than corresponding unvegetated mudflat. However, by excluding SOC accumulation from prior land use (i.e., unvegetated mudflat), non-native species (i.e., SA) showed a significantly higher ecosystem carbon sequestration rate (8.2-16.4 Mg C ha(-1) yr(-1)) than native KO (4.5 Mg C ha(-1) yr(-1)), owing largely to fast biomass carbon sequestration in SA ecosystem. Relative to mudflat reference, the input of autochthonous source (mangrove tissues) contributed substantially to additional carbon sequestration under mangroves. It should be noted that the relative size of carbon sequestration in non-native mangroves is also affected by factors related to ecosystem, climate, soil properties and land use, the differences still exist among locations, and ecosystem modeling with field validation is desirable for regional estimation of carbon stocks and sequestration rates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available