4.7 Review

Antibiofilm activity of phytochemicals against Enterococcus faecalis: A literature review

Journal

PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
Volume 36, Issue 7, Pages 2824-2838

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ptr.7488

Keywords

antibiotics; biofilms; Enterococcus faecalis; flavonoids; phytochemical; terpenes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review discusses the antimicrobial tolerance attributes of Enterococcus faecalis biofilms, explores the potential of using phytochemicals to combat microbial pathogens, and reports the antibiofilm activity and mechanisms of action of these compounds against E. faecalis.
Enterococcus faecalis is a leading causative pathogen of recalcitrant infections affecting heart valves, urinary tract, surgical wounds and dental root canals. Its robust biofilm formation, production of virulence factors and antibiotic resistance contribute significantly to its pathogenicity in persistent infections. The decreased effectiveness of most of antibiotics in preventing and/or eradicating E. faecalis biofilms mandates the discovery of alternative novel antibiofilm agents. Phytochemicals are potential sources of antibiofilm agents due to their antivirulence activity, diversity of chemical structure and multiple mechanisms of action. In this review, we describe the phenotypic and genetic attributes that contribute to antimicrobial tolerance of E. faecalis biofilms. We illuminate the benefits of implementing the phytochemicals to tackle microbial pathogens. Finally, we report the antibiofilm activity of phytochemicals against E. faecalis, and explain their mechanisms of action. These compounds belong to different chemical classes such as terpenes, phenylpropenes, flavonoids, curcuminoids and alkaloids. They demonstrate the ability to inhibit the formation of and/or eradicate E. faecalis biofilms. However, the exact mechanisms of action of most of these compounds are not fully understood. Therefore, the future studies should elucidate the underlying mechanisms in detail.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available