4.7 Article

Wavelet analysis of high-speed transition and turbulence over a flat surface

Journal

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0088479

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-19-1-7018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a study of high speed boundary layers using the wavelet method. The analysis of direct numerical simulation data reveals that the coherent parts of the flow are close to the statistics of the total flow, while the incoherent parts show equidistributed energy. Furthermore, the study finds that the incoherent vorticity correlates with the near-wall pressure fluctuations, suggesting its importance in understanding compressible boundary layers.
This paper presents a study of high speed boundary layers using the wavelet method. We analyze direct numerical simulation data for high-speed, compressible transitional, and turbulent boundary layer flows using orthogonal anisotropic wavelets. The wavelet-based method of extraction of coherent structures is applied to the flow vorticity field, decomposed into coherent and incoherent contributions using thresholding of the wavelet coefficients. We show that the coherent parts of the flow, enstrophy spectra, are close to the statistics of the total flow, and the energy of the incoherent, noise-like background flow is equidistributed. Furthermore, we investigate the distribution of the incoherent vorticity in the transition and turbulent regions and examine the correlation with the near-wall pressure fluctuations. The results of our analysis suggest that the incoherent vorticity part is not a random noise and correlates with the actual noise emanating from inside the boundary layer. This could have implications regarding our understanding of the physics of compressible boundary layers and the development of engineering models. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available