4.7 Article

Thermocapillary convection in liquid-in-liquid capillary bridges due to a heating/cooling ring

Journal

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0082389

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India [DST/INSPIRE/04/2015/000449]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the thermocapillary convection and interface deformation of a liquid bridge surrounded by a heating/cooling ring in the presence of another immiscible liquid under the influence of gravity through 2D axisymmetric simulations. The results show that there is a significant difference in flow and heat transfer patterns between the heating and cooling cases. The interfacial velocity and bridge deformation are more stable when a cooling ring surrounds the liquid bridge. Moreover, a cooling ring reduces deformation, while a heating ring enhances interface deformation.
A liquid bridge connecting two solid disks is surrounded by a heating/cooling ring in the presence of another immiscible liquid. The thermocapillary convection and the interface deformation thus generated in a gravitational environment are studied for a range of bridge aspect ratios and ring temperatures using 2D axisymmetric simulations. A stark difference between the heater and cooler cases is observed in their flow and heat transfer patterns. Interfacial velocity and bridge deformation are seen to be more stable when a cooling ring surrounds the liquid bridge. Fluid trajectories inside the bridge show longer paths as the temperature difference between the cooler/heater and the surroundings is raised. Moreover, a cooler lessens the deformation, whereas a heater enhances the deformation of the phase interface. Anomalous results for a heat transfer rate, interface deformation, and circulation patterns are obtained in the heater configuration for larger height to radius ratios.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available