Beyond automatic medical image segmentation-the spectrum between fully manual and fully automatic delineation

Semi-automatic and fully automatic contouring tools have emerged as an alternative to fully manual segmentation to reduce time spent contouring and to increase contour quality and consistency. Particularly, fully automatic segmentation has seen exceptional improvements through the use of deep learning in recent years. These fully automatic methods may not require user interactions, but the resulting contours are often not suitable to be used in clinical practice without a review by the clinician. Furthermore, they need large amounts of labelled data to be available for training. This review presents alternatives to manual or fully automatic segmentation methods along the spectrum of variable user interactivity and data availability. The challenge lies to determine how much user interaction is necessary and how this user interaction can be used most effectively. While deep learning is already widely used for fully automatic tools, interactive methods are just at the starting point to be transformed by it. Interaction between clinician and machine, via artificial intelligence, can go both ways and this review will present the avenues that are being pursued to improve medical image segmentation.

Automated summary

Semi-automatic and fully automatic contouring tools have emerged as alternatives to manual segmentation, reducing time and improving quality. However, reviewed by clinicians, the resulting contours may not be suitable for clinical practice. This review presents alternative methods along the spectrum of user interactivity and data availability, addressing the challenge of determining optimal user interaction. While deep learning is widely used for fully automatic tools, interactive methods are just beginning to be transformed by it.