4.8 Article

Causality Constraints on Gravitational Effective Field Theories

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 128, Issue 13, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.131102

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. STFC [ST/P000762/1, ST/T000791/1]
  2. Royal Society
  3. European Union Horizon 2020 Research Council [724659 MassiveCosmo ERC2016COG]
  4. Simons Foundation under the Simons Foundation Origins of the Universe initiative [555326]
  5. Simons Investigator Grant [690508]
  6. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences [118900M061]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this article, we investigate the effective field theory of gravity around black holes and find that the coefficients of the dimension-8 operators are tightly constrained by causality considerations. These constraints are more stringent than previously derived causality and positivity bounds, suggesting that the effects of a single dimension-8 operator cannot be observed while maintaining causality. We also identify the regime where the generic dimension-8 and lower order operators can potentially be observable while preserving causality.
We consider the effective field theory of gravity around black holes, and show that the coefficients of the dimension-8 operators are tightly constrained by causality considerations. Those constraints are consistent with???but tighter than???previously derived causality and positivity bounds and imply that the effects of one of the dimension-8 operators by itself cannot be observable while remaining consistent with causality. We then establish in which regime one can expect the generic dimension-8 and lower order operators to be potentially observable while preserving causality, providing a theoretical prior for future observations. We highlight the importance of ???infrared causality??? and show that the requirement of ???asymptotic causality??? or net (sub)luminality would fail to properly diagnose violations of causality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available