4.6 Article

Vibrational description of the LiAr molecule in its X2Σ+ and A2 Π electronic states in the framework of an algebraic model

Journal

PHYSICA SCRIPTA
Volume 97, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1402-4896/ac6a1f

Keywords

molecular system; vibrational description; lie algebra; morse potential; LiAr

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, the vibrational energy levels, kinetic energy, and potential energy of the LiAr molecule in different electronic states were studied using the Morse potential and so(2, 1) spectrum generating algebra approach. An algorithm for calculating the expectation value of Z(q) = (e(-alpha(r-re)))(q) for specific states of Li (X-2 Sigma(+)) Ar and Li (A(2)Pi) Ar was proposed. Closed-form estimations for the expectation value < r >(n) of Li (X-2 Sigma(+)) Ar and Li (A(2)Pi) Ar were derived using Jensen's inequality. The obtained results were compared to existing theoretical and experimental results, showing good agreement.
In this work, the vibrational energy levels, the kinetic energy and the potential energy of the LiAr molecule in its X-2 Sigma(+) and A(2)Pi electronic states are studied using the Morse potential and so(2, 1) spectrum generating algebra approach. An algorithm for the recursive evaluation of the expectation value of Z(q) = (e(-alpha(r-re)))(q) for a given state of Li (X-2 Sigma(+)) Ar and Li (A(2)Pi) Ar are proposed. As an application closed-form estimations for the value < r >(n) of Li (X-2 Sigma(+)) Ar and Li (A(2)Pi) Ar were derived using Jensen's inequality. This allows us to obtain several inequalities relating the radial expectation value < r >(n) of Li (X-2 Sigma(+)) Ar and Li (A(2)Pi) Ar at the logarithme of the expectation value of Z(q) = (e(-alpha(r-re)))(q). These obtained outcomes are compared to the published results, both theoretical and experimental, and show a good agreement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available